Subscribe to the blog! (RSS)
Don't forget about labor
One of the reasons I was so fortunate to have been able to attend Take Back America was that I got the opportunity to hear the perspectives of a number of people in the organized labor movement. Despite my fairly progressive upbringing, this was a constituency that I rarely heard from. I didn't grow up in a union household, nor did I know anyone who did. In fact, I daresay the sizable majority of my generation had little familial exposure to the labor movement.
Some of the reasons why this came to be were presented at TBA. Union membership in the U.S. has declined precipitously in the last few decades, and indeed the U.S. has a lower rate of union-organized employees than even newly emerging democracies like Brazil. It trails other developed nations significantly.
The labor movement is a very important historical constituency for the Democratic party and for the progressive movement in general. It's unfortunate to hear and see it become less of a relevant force in American politics. The accomplishment of the labor movement are manifold and have been mostly been bestowed on non-unionized sectors (like the non-profit world, for example) as well -- the establishment of the 40-hour work week, paid and family leave, pensions...
Still, when I talk to my ostensibly progressive peers about the state of the labor movement, even they have adopted numerous right-wing canards. Unions can become very bureaucratic, they might say, and ultimately take dues out of their rank-and-file's paychecks to pay big-shot lawyers to play politics. Union shops have too many rules and regulations and it's a damper on productivity. Not everyone wants to be in the union, so why should they?
It is quite ironic. The big corporations that unions were created to play the foil too are somehow not more guilty by severalfold of these things? It's the same argument right-wingers use to argue against single-payer health care, as though big health insurance aren't bureaucratic and abusive.
I know most of the progressive movement insiders are in on this, but we who are not part of "big labor" all would do well to keep in mind that they are on our team, and they always have been. They can be critical partners in the struggle for the environment, for the sanity of the courts, and certainly for economic justice for the working people they represent.
As the fallout from the sub-prime crisis and the other abusive practices of the financial industry slowly come to light, more and stronger voices for working people (a definition into which I include myself and a host of other young people struggling to make it in one of the most difficult economic climates in decades in this country) are sorely needed. Solidarity, my friends.
- Matt Johnson's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Labor's got to evolve
Indeed, we should be focusing on every avenue we can.
Labor is crucial because it's the number one way to secure a working class contingency to Progressivism (we get the working class through economic populism, conservatives win them over through social wedge issue populism).
That said, unions do have bureaucratic tendancies. We can't go back in time to a nostalgia-induced, Keynesian paradise that never existed.
If the burden is on progressives in general to help their union brethren out, then it is just as incumbent on labor to help themselves.
They must abandon business unionism. Instead of simply begging the corporations for higher wages and benefits, they must take the extra step and work to have a greater voice in production itself. Rather than playing the role of antagonist, labor must expand a purely economic movement into a social one, and push for greater democracy in the workplace, as well as a better living.
They must take a decisive stand against the chauvinism and nationalist posturing that unions have unfortunately fallen victim to throughout the 20th century, and still do today. (No, we won't solve our problems by simply "buying American.")
In short, they have to abandon the issue-based identity politics that every major progressive constituency group clings to, and pool their resources with like-minded groups. The Blue-Green Alliance is one of many first steps in this regard. Their struggle is completely identical to ours, in that respect.
Next Steps
Great points Anders. Another important step is to vaccinate working class supporters from conservative social wedge populism. Unions could be a great audience for lgbt groups to run education campaigns like they do on college campuses. It could be the first step towards a Blue-Green-Rainbow Alliance (which also seems like it could make a really pretty flag.)
Interesting idea. Unions as
Interesting idea. Unions as target audiences for various kinds of antioppression work.
This isn't quite the same thing, but: Pride at Work
The goal
Unions as vessels for social progressivism, student groups as advocates for organized labor, environmental groups as a vehicle for fighting racial injustice. Make as many combinations as you want, they all amount to the same thing.
I'd like to live to see a day when these groups stop seeing themselves as "labor", or "student" groups above all else, but as co-partners of the same movement, woven together in the same infrastructure.
Fratricide is the enemy. Unity is our only hope.
Yes, yes, and yes.
And the task of student activists and organizers is to foster a strong worker rights (and even syndicalist) sentiment among fellow students, so they will be more amenable and open to organizing on the job once they graduate.
Students are the workplace radicals of the future!