Subscribe to the blog! (RSS)
Supreme: almighty, most powerful, last recourse, top of the heap
Each state has its own courts, then you have the federales. California once had three levels of court, now just two: the municipal courts were subsumed into the superior courts. Then you have the State Supreme Court. We also have a circuit court in San Francisco, but that one is federal. Beyond the circuit courts, you only find the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Let's see...there is also the difference in civil and criminal cases, but I think those exist side-by-side in all the above courts. I'm fuzzy on that. Also, small claims courts exist at the local level; they are for civil cases only and have a cap on maximum judgments. To request larger judgments, you have to go to superior court.
I still have a lot to learn. I would really like to look at important court cases, especially Marbury v. Madison, as well as documents that preceded the founding of the U.S. However, the specific focus for this class is the Supreme Court of the U.S., and that single topic is quite big enough. Well, perhaps the numbers and locations of the circuit courts and how a case gets taken there and how it can (or can't) move on to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I've been reading and commenting on other people's blogs: the class began yesterday (zip on Sunday: I checked) and I haven't checked yet to see what we are supposed to be doing. I am also taking two other (credit) classes this summer, both independent study, which meet this week. So. I think I will see what it is I am being directed to do.
I've collected quite a big on how we vote (mostly on issues with machinery, and a fair amount on superdelegates). Not so much on the Supreme Court, but I've found the Washington Post the best source for news on the court. Has anyone read The Brethren?
- Carol Crooks's blog
- Login or register to post comments



The Brethren
I assume you're referring to this one and not that one. I'll add it to my list of books to read.
Reply to Rebecca
Rebecca, yes, I forgot there were two by that title. Also noted my typo (quite a big for bit), and I left out District Courts in the federal hierarchy. Still, what I wrote above was out of my head, and I didn't note any other errors after listening to the interview. Stuff like this can be hard, it's so dry if you don't use it all the time, and then it can be hard to recall.
I think I read another book on the Court, but I'm mid-move so am unsure if I can find it.
Aw...
I knew I should have included that winking emoticon! I was actually kidding around about the book comparison. :)
My sincere thanks for the recommendation, though. No pressure, but if you remember the other book post-move I'd be curious to know about it.
Enjoy the course!
The Brethren
Actually, I had a couple of funny reactions in the past when mentioning the name - not humorous, but odd. I didn't understand until I ran across the other book. It's the Woodward and Armstrong book I meant. I just checked - and found that book, not the other. But there's good material on the court in "In Our Defense: the Bill of Rights in Action" by Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy (yes, that Caroline). It examines each amendment through the lens of important court cases which, in most cases, reached the Supreme Court.
Some background's available other places. The Lily Ledbetter case concerns women's right to fair working conditions. On the AFL-CIO website, there's a book about WWII women at work that I want to buy. East End Press publishes a lot of labor books, too, and National Women's History Project has a lot available on the web. But I don't know a single source for important court information, beyond gov't sites, which I suspect are difficult to sift.
NEWS!!!
Alex Kozinski, chief of 9th Circuit Court, posted sexually explicit photos on the web, says he didn't know the public could access it - see www.latimes.com (it's on the front page top left). (However it comes out, the 9th circuit's unpopular with the administration already. It's the one in San Francisco, and the Administration has proposed splitting it into two circuit courts.) The notice to me said more will be available soon, so it's a story in progress. Apparently he's the judge in an obscenity case. For updates, see:
http://link.latimes.com/r/UX0Z1O/VLROZ/GJ9X2K/CK2X/FLZA0/FW/...
Another source for court information
You might like the Court Watch blog.
Court Watch
Yes!